|
|
|
Advertisement
Active Sellers
    |
The Battle of Bunker's Hill: 17th June 1775
DescriptionA simple wargame using counters or miniatures (not supplied) to simulate the battle of Bunker's Hill. Movement and combat are straightforward, with infantry having a short effective firing range, hitting on a roll of 6 on an ordinary die. In melee a simple comparison of combat value is made, with the weaker unit retreating. Artillery units have a long range but limited mobility as you would expect. The American forces have stronger firepower but are weaker in melee, thus the British need to press their attack strongly. Game DiscussionsAdd CommentYou need to be logged in to comment. Insert Bullet List Please enter at least one item. Item: Item: Item: Item: Item: Insert Numeric List Please enter at least one item. Item: Item: Item: Item: Item: Insert Link Please enter the link of the website Optionally you can add display text Insert Email Please enter the email address Optionally add any display text Insert Image Please enter the link of the image Insert YouTube Video Please enter the link of the video MarketplaceNo listings at the moment. Do you own this game? Click here to list it for sale.
Similar Games
|
Best Sellers
Board Games
|
||||||||||||||
Latest Searches: Stockton | Avoyelles parish opoly | greek+myths | squad leader | Idiot test | juman | river | Mankato monopoly | disney | Cicero Opoly | squeeze play | Dangerous | Tactiki | Uno with friends | Kính hi | jeu monopoly bruins de boston | buzz+word | minecraft | wacopoly | catan bundle | RISK NAPOLEON | Parker brothers the great dragon hunt | gimm tales | farmer | Chutes+and+larderà | mac 3 játékok | keflower | Oxnard | oxnard monopoly | Jumbo jungle
Sitemap: All Categories | All Publishers | All Designers | All Mechanisms | All Artists | All Family
© 2018-2024 BoardGames.com | Your source for everything to do with Board Games
All Rights Reserved
All Rights Reserved
Please note: BoardGames.com will receive commissions from purchases made through links on this page.
Comments (0)